Eric, there you go - you understood me.
I wont agree to disagree - I don't do that, but I have train to take care of.
…train…
So you want a definition of “normal.” This tells me a great deal, you know – for once, that you haven’t read what I have been saying in this thread, or in the multitude of other threads which I lash out against the abnormal. What, were you waiting for me to summarize my thoughts in such a ridiculousmanner, to such a straightforward and thoughtless appearance only so you can spit at me your trauma about the indefinition of what, exactly, is “normal”? Nevertheless, since you say you read what I say, which is quite appreciated…then I tell you to read, reread, and read cautiously and carefully.
…you also want to know what I consider to be religious. Now, with a little self-deprecation and a little self-deception on my part, I could force myself to understand how you manage to skip over my definition of what is normal, especially since I have been raving about it not just in this thread, but in any thread to which I contribute such lengthy essays. But…to not have grasped what my definition of what I refer to as "religious"? That, my dear friend, no self-deprecation, no deception, no force can make me pretend that it is “alright.” However, since it is quite simple who I refer to as religious, I’ll be happy to remind you – simply anyone who believes in the power of Christ, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, the prophets, one God, Heaven, Holiness, divinity, “light,” God’s kingdom, God’s chosen people – anyone who even accepts the notion of them even if he himself isn’t religiously active, is in my definition a degenerate species. The mere tolerance shown to them, the general positive attitude in which they are perceived – all that falls under what I call “religious.” Quite an unjust judgment, I know, but as I examine the symptoms of such people, I find them to be quite ill, poisoned by religion, even if they only tolerate the religious.
…as for freedom. That’s a subject dear and near to my heart, because I do believe in freedom, but I do not believe it to be a gift given to mankind by our lovely mother Nature. On the contrary, I believe that freedom is earned by becoming what one is – in most cases, one is born a slave, and shall remain a slave at heart even when his freedom is given to him – his physical body is free, but his instincts, his restraint, his spirit, his taste, his intellectuality are still unfree, still of a slavish heritage that Nature has given to him.
When I encounter such “free” people, who are oppressive and oppressed by their own Nature, I can’t help but wonder what has the world gone into to still allow such inborn slaves to freedom? Have we not yet learned that the unfree mustn’t be freed? Those deserving of freedom, spiritual freedom, mental freedom, freedom at its best, already possess the freedom – there is no talks about liberation, no want of freedom, no confinement, no strive to be free – one is free, one is by Nature free if Nature bestowed him the strength and spirit to be free. In such cases, rare cases by all means, one is incarnate freedom, a bashing boulder against all obstacles. On the other hand, Nature also gives many the right to be beneath, to remain enslaved, to remain ignorant to the language of freedom – to remain in a state of constant demand of freedom, without themselves knowing what freedom is. What danger! The poor oppressed class of people: oppressed and with every right to remain oppressed. He who desires freedom is unfree. Every individual man who frees himself is free by Nature – he was initially free, he simply acted on his freedom: he became what he is – he became his freedom, given to him by his Nature. The moment he frees the unfree out of generosity of heart or out of pity, out of lust for power or desire for pleasure, as is the case of “wars of liberation,” he invites a slave to masterdom. And how much would a slave value what he hadn’t earned? How much would a poor reject of Nature, a retard, the inferior in Nature, understand of that which does not belong to him, how can he become what he is not? Not at all! He will waste it away, he will push it to the limit, to absurdity, to fanatical ends…he would still cry for “freedom” – he looks at free men and he envies them, he does not want their freedom…he wants their spirit of freedom, he wants the higher and brighter light they emit, he wants their Nature! Because he does not understand freedom, because he is unfree, because he was freed but not free, because he is, returning back to his roots and his mother Nature, a slave at heart – and will remain a slave at heart even when he is given his freedom: his body is free, but his instincts, his taste, his spirit, his dignity remain vulgar and slavish. Take the modern case of Martin Luther King – a great man beyond doubt: he was free! He was free at heart. His Nature was free. Every other black man King freed is yet a Spade in Nature’s hand and never an Ace, certainly unworthy of a King.
He who has not earned his freedom is a slave. He who is not his own freedom is a slave. He who is in want of freedom is yet a slave. Look at America: a haven for all basic instincts, for anything low and retarded, everything degenerating in man is American, European, or Arabian. The “American dream” – in other words: towards the obedience of all that is basest in man by the means of complete freedom, unrestrained freedom and opinion, the right to be stupid, the right and freedom to remain stupid, yet with power! freedom of instincts, the strive after “happiness” before the strive for anything else – happiness is placed high on the scale of priorities as part of the freedoms that one may exercise, before growth, taste, intelligence, restraint – restraint removed from the meaning of freedom, when it is the first principle of freedom. The free thinks in terms of what to restrain; the freed thinks in terms of how free, and with that thought, he might even want to “increase” his freedom. Why is America such a garbage lot? Because it is the home of the freed! O America, O haven of the slaves, haven of the freed, haven for the base.
At the end, what is the burning envy that every non-American secretly experiences towards anything and everything American? It is an envy of…a life of extreme slavishness, of hasty degeneration, of degradation of man. The global condemnation of America is at bottom the desire to be an American, thus the desire to value one’s self with slaves, to enjoy the contemporary life, freedom, and right of the slaves – one needs, amongst many things, a personality of an extreme give-and-take nature, a supra-considerate nature, a tolerating attitude, a “good” attitude, and a close relation with slavish heritage…tolerating slaves for themselves, forgiving their slavish heritage, in order to be admitted to their haven of man degradation. What is it when one envies the lowest instincts in man, in such instances when the world envies Americans? – it is to lower the standard of mankind as a whole, to degrade man inside and out, to hate man, to pay irreverence towards man! With every envious eye, the standard is dragged downward…eventually everyone is at peace with one another! But not at peace with themselves. World peace – self-denial, self-deception, repression, “tolerance”: degrading the man species. The world as a slave market with no buyers whatsoever…“free slaves”…who still demand freedom and liberation.
And yet we have barn animals who call themselves free – everywhere you look, you hear the shouts and boasts of freedom! You yourself might entertain the thought that you are free, that our lovely Nature has bestowed upon you the right to be free, while on the contrary, if anything, Nature has a distinct order of rank, and not equality; masterdom and slavedom, and not tolerance and acceptance. Your proud America calls itself “free” – it has made out of freedom a necessity, a law, something given to anyone and anywho…it has blurred the lines between noble men of Nature and the inferiors, the subhumans, of Nature. Sure it has made freedom a law! And not a privilege…but a law! Everyone must be free! Man is free! “Liberate” all! The acceptance of all! The loving for all! Constant leveling of man to the point of the most unholy degradation and devaluing of man. Oh, freedom is a law – hence it is given and not earned. Hence it is demanded and spoken about, even held high as some mass-privilege, when it is the privilege of rare few. Freedom as a
motto - that's the last
attack against freedom before the freedom as a whole loses its value -
everyone is free! Zoo animals and man-copycats, subhumans and inferiors, all labeled "Man."
...And you must realize how such empty concepts do not as of yet exist! There is no tolerance, there is no loving all, no acceptance, no consideration – there is a demand for freedom, to sustain that freedom, and even to “free the unfree.” As a consquence of this, you see people
attempt to become what they are not, merely to grasp a type of Nature they are, by
their Nature, blinded to. What is such rhetoric, then? empty rhetoric as “tolerance”? It is a suppressive method in which we tolerate against our will, and not out of our inborn instincts. There is a demand for tolerance,
meaning that tolerance is initially lacking – meaning you are demanding that which does not exist. What there is, is an illusion of “peace” and getting-along – in the inside, such a thing is lacking, and every man who participates in such a masquerade is an internal war of desires, of instincts, mental illnesses, cancers, and above all, ignorance. And once again, all these are
side effects of the attempt to be "liberated,"
and not liberation.
train:
Straightforward. The idea of God, the "divine," "reason," "objectivity," "for the sake of others" - are all products of the aforementioned sick men and the degenerating man species in general.
And yet you have taken part in the dissection of this product... Does that mean you believe in it also?...
Indeed I believe in it...I believe that such ideas must be banished from the dictionary of mankind. I dissect them, of course I do! I am striving to cleanse my mother Nature of this curse.
train:
Straightforward. I just write for the wrong crowd, that’s all. Ever felt that way? Like you're in the wrong crowd?
You don't write for the wrong crowd... you present ideals to a crowd that does not share theideals being presented... but finding the right crowd, one that shares the ideals, is to segregate yourself, if they are the onyl ones you wish to write for... You say yourself - "push the limits"... so why limit yourself with the right crowd... Doing as you have been is the only way an ideal can be shared, or made known to other's existence...
At this point, I can't help but recall what TICM replied to this:
TICM:
True, but a "right crowd" might work to understand what he's saying and penetrate deeper than semantics in criticism of his views.
In my words, they would at least
respect me a little more for sharing my thoroughly thought thoughts, and not dismiss them as mere "opinions," like Spiderman did...or generally misunderstand what I say, or like many claim, that I am incomprehensible. Which is
alright - I don't seek to blame anyone for this anymore, because, again, I'm being too "intellectual" (like EricBess said) in the wrong crowd.
One thing I confess to is being downright manipulative. So what? People are insincere, and in most cases, they are unaware of the
whys behind their own choices. A religious man
does not often know why he is religious
other than the simple fact that he "suffers," or in the case of Christians, that he is, somehow, a "sinner." My manipulative nature has helped me see through the thickest masks known to mankind...
