How can a card represent "casual" if noone plays it? There are lots of cards, which are interresting, but also are so weak, that noone plays them. Very casual, but not very classic. Some of these might even be someones personal favourite. But that doesnt make it a classic.I don't think the question is "How often is a card played". I think the question is "What card from <this expansion> most represents 'casual', whether or not it's been played 'a lot'".
Tier 1? I don't know about that. And it's not hard for a card to be used in a first tier deck in Standard, because the card pool is small. I don't think casual means "anti-tournament." I would agree that broken cards like Vampiric Tutor are not in the right "spirit" or whatever, but "casual" does not mean "anti-tournament." I've seen Living Death used in very casual decks, and more often than I've seen some of the other nominations.Ransac said:I agree, but at the same time I feel that a card that was a staple of a formerly tier 1 tournament deck (Living Death) is hardly casual as well.
Well, that's true. But I always thought the cards that broke decks like that were Survival and Recurring Nightmare (mostly Survival). And Living Death was just a mechanism to exploit this. I guess they wouldn't have been nearly as good without it, though...Gizmo said:Living Death was Tier-1 in several decks, like the "14" combo deck, the Survival Of The Fittest deck that I won 5 months of tournaments with... Living Death was a serious Grade-A tournament card.
Turn1: Birds
Turn2: Survival, pitch a monster to get Avalanche Riders
Turn3: Riders your land, pitch a monster to get Avalanche Riders
Turn4: Riders your land, pitch a monster to get Avalanche Riders
Turn5: Riders your land, pitch 2 monsters to fill graveyard with fatties
Turn6: Living Death for 3 Avalanche Riders and 4 other creatures to leave you with no permanents. Call it my game?
I didn't say "no one plays it". I said "whether it's been played 'a lot'", meaning since there's hardly any way for to keep track of how many times a card is used in a non-tourney setting, no one knows how many times a card has been played. But given that there's thousands of Magic players, I find it hard to believe that "no one" has looked at Booby Trap and thought "hey, this would be great to build a deck around". And at least three people here have alreadyKillerbob said:How can a card represent "casual" if noone plays it? There are lots of cards, which are interresting, but also are so weak, that noone plays them. Very casual, but not very classic. Some of these might even be someones personal favourite. But that doesnt make it a classic.