Well, *now* they are, but if there's enough of them, they could get their own separate creature typeAren't they all considered "beasts?"
We did, actually. And I ruined it again? I don't know. I prefer the charitable explanation that none of us were really thinking about whether individual tribes should be banned in a "everything but tribal creatures is restricted" format, so when CanadianBrad expressed that they shouldn't be, we went with that. I lazily ported my Legacy Goblins decklist (I wouldn't actually play Goblins in Legacy, because it involves turning cards sideways too much for me to want to play it in a tournament, but I have an interest in the archetype anyway) into the new format and killed everyone again. I don't know that we would have continued with more tribal games right away if I had played a fairer deck, but I worry that this might have been the case. Especially since I won five in a row and the last two were ridiculous.LET'S DO THIS MOST OF MY DECKS ARE TRIBAL.
Oversoul said:I lazily ported my Legacy Goblins decklist (I wouldn't actually play Goblins in Legacy, because it involves turning cards sideways too much for me to want to play it in a tournament, but I have an interest in the archetype anyway) into the new format and killed everyone again.
I've seen special budget-enforced formats before, but I don't think anyone has tried getting that sort of thing going here. We're probably too lazy to look up a bunch of card prices anyway.What about custom restricted/banned lists or deck cost caps?
By turning cards sideways, I meant attacking with creatures. I was referring to the fact that Goblins in Legacy involves tapping lands to play creatures, then tapping those creatures to attack. You know, like a normal person plays the game. I'm totally up for doing that in casual games. I used to play totally "unfair" decks everywhere, but I've mellowed out and decided that I should appreciate all aspects of the game, even if I'm not always playing my pet deck. I met some players new to the game and decided to try to make it so that the decks I'd play would challenge them, but still lose more often than not.Also, I a snoob, what's this mean?
I'll help in any way I can.I've seen special budget-enforced formats before, but I don't think anyone has tried getting that sort of thing going here. We're probably too lazy to look up a bunch of card prices anyway.
I'm all for a custom banned list, but that would require a committee to update it, and we don't seem to have sufficient interest in just playing more of those games, let alone in collaborating on designing a custom banned list.
Does combo imply infinite combo?But for the purposes of Legacy tournament play (which I was on long hiatus from for the past few years, but I'm putting decks together now), I don't bother with "fair" decks. I only play combo.
I've done infinite combos a lot in the past. The decks I'm working on right now for Legacy are Ad Nauseam Tendrils, Oops, All Spells!, and Belcher, none of which go infinite. That wasn't really a factor in my decision to focus on those decks. They're just the ones that appeal to me the most at the moment. I'm also probably building a Dredge deck as a backup, but it's a little too aggro-like for my liking.Does combo imply infinite combo?
Mostly, since we play for fun and the games take a while, we try not to go turn three I kill you all, with maniacal laughter.Does combo imply infinite combo?